last thursday night i went to a gathering at an organization that some of my friends are in, something called international teams. they care a lot about refugees, and i happened to see that on one of their shelves was a book called 'embracing the infidel,' and i was intrigued enough by the title and the reviews on the back of the dust jacket to borrow it and read it this week. the book is written by a guy named
behzad yaghmaian, who was born in Iran but moved to the United States where he is a political economy professor. the book is about immigrants. legal and illegal, trying to get out of muslim states and into the west. the book is formatted as a collection of short stories.
to gather the stories for the book, he took time off from teaching and travelled to the middle east, starting in Iran, talking to people about what they enjoyed about the state and what troubled them. from there he would move closer and closer to the heart of 'the west,' first to turkey, then to greece, to france and finally to england (the dream destination of many journeying migrants). i find that books full of good stories, especially real true-to-life stories, are hard to put down. i sometimes found it difficult to separate the individuals' stories in my mind because so many of the narrative elements were similar (harsh past, border guard brutality, rejection by friends family and prospective countries, hunger, poverty), but the content was more than worth a little confusion.
i've never really thought much about refugees or migrants. there just weren't many in northern ontario. reading this book has brought me a lot of questions, however. in the book, people are often rejected for asylum because their home-countries have become safer (i'm thinking mainly of afghanistan), or because there is a regime change that western countries deem favorable. in some ways i find it hard to really understand why these people are so dead-set on going to the west. is it really that much better? i suppose it is for some, what with the harsh family judgment they are receiving in their conservative countries. but what really drives them to the west? the commercials they see on tv? freedom, free markets, less corruption. you can hardly blame them for wanting to be part of it when we (the west) flaunt what we have in their direction on every channel and website, twenty-four seven. we want them to buy our goods and want to expand our markets to them, but don't want them coming over to where we are, taking our jobs, yadda yadda. and i can understand the immigration policies that these western countries have, too, to a certain extent. but it is hard to justify when you think that we have turned the west into a promised land in their eyes and then put up a big thick line around it with guard dogs and square badges prone to violence.
you can read
sample chapters on his website.